Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at MTL

Blue Jackets run the Canadiens off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 11:47 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.69Expected goals3.01
61% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)22
10High-danger chances2
69Corsi (all attempts)48
Score-adjusted: 53% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Montreal held 40% of shot attempts but fell 5-2. The gap between shot share and goal share exposed just how thoroughly Columbus dominated underlying play.

The Blue Jackets controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (4.69–3.01). Their offensive pressure was relentless: they created 10 high-danger chances to Montreal's 2. Columbus converted 4 of 31 rush chances while Montreal scored 2 on 25 attempts.

J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 1.01 goals above expected. J. Dobes (MTL) posted a 0.848 save percentage.

C. Coyle's snap shot from the doorstep (P3, 09:59) broke the game open. He finished with 2 goals in 21:53. K. Marchenko added 1G, 1A in 17:12. A. Fantilli contributed 2A in 15:41. Montreal underperformed their xG by 1.01 goals.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ2 / 10 · 2.35 xG
MTL0 / 2 · 0.47 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ3 / 17 · 1.78 xG
MTL2 / 18 · 2.04 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 42 · 0.56 xG
MTL0 / 28 · 0.50 xG

CBJ went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.78 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 4.69 xG · +0.3
MTL
2 G · 3.01 xG · -1.0
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GreavesCBJ
+1.0
J. DobesMTL
-0.3

CBJ finished +0.3 against expected, MTL -1.0 — J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 1.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
SNAP4/33
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND1/2
WRIST0/2
OTHER0/20
MTL
SNAP2/24
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
WRIST0/0
OTHER0/12
CBJ
MTL
Off the rush
4 G on 31 · 3.39 xG
2 G on 25 · 2.19 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.60 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.14 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CBJ went 4-for-33, MTL 2-for-24. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Coyle
#3 · C · CBJ
2 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 21:53 TOI · +1
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 17:12 TOI · +1
A. Fantilli
#19 · C · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 15:41 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 31 rush chances.
  • CBJ created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 11:22 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
CBJ
Model favorite
51%
49%
CBJ50MTL

CBJ by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.62.5 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →MTL
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.63xGF / 602.41
2.43xGA / 602.62
2.12Goals for / gm2.24
1.98Goals against / gm1.96
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.018

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.018) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6–2.5 Blue Jackets victory with Columbus at 51% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Montreal arrives hotter: 9–1–0 in their last 10 games. Columbus is underwater at -15 goal differential over the same stretch. Yet the underlying metrics favor Columbus. At 5v5, the Jackets control 52.0% expected goal share to Montreal's 48.0%, and 51.0% Corsi to 49.0%. Montreal's PDO of 1.018 explains the disconnect—they're running hot, and regression should follow.

Boone Jenner leads Columbus's attack with 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes and 11 goals on 9.6% shooting. Mathieu Olivier (0.89 xG/60, 12 goals) complements him, though he hasn't played in 13 days. Cole Caufield powers Montreal with 33 goals at 0.97 xG/60 and 20.0% shooting, backed by Oliver Kapanen (19 goals, 0.83 xG/60, 17.8% shooting).

The outcome turns on finishes. Columbus dominates possession and shot quality but lacks rebound production. Conor Garland represents the Jackets' defensive soft spot; Mike Matheson is Montreal's. Neither team's advantage is large enough to overcome the other's strengths.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters