Backcheck
Recap · PHI at WPG

Flyers pull away from the Jets

The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 11:24 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
7
Home
WPG
Winnipeg Jets
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.88Expected goals2.92
50% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)28
4High-danger chances3
50Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 38% / 62%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Flyers overwhelmed the Jets 7-1, but underlying metrics told a different story. Expected goals ran nearly even at 2.92–2.88 favoring Winnipeg, and the Jets controlled 55% of shot attempts. High-danger chances favored the visitors 4-3. Yet Philadelphia's finish was ruthless; Winnipeg's goalies couldn't hold.

D. Vladar stopped 27 of 28 shots and saved 1.92 goals above expected. The Jets' tandem cratered: E. Comrie gave up 1.62 more than expected, C. Hellebuyck 2.49. Goaltending swung the game by six-plus goals—the underlying play said this should have been close.

Philadelphia scored from low-danger areas and converted five of 22 rush attempts—a lethal clip. Nick Seeler's snap shot from the top of the circles (P3, 13:32) exemplified their precision.

S. Couturier (2G, 1A in 17:01) and N. Cates (1G, 2A in 13:33) led the onslaught. R. Ristolainen (2A in 21:45) wired the offense from the blue line.

The Jets created four rebound chances but converted just one—crashing without conviction. The Flyers also generated four rebounds and converted none. The difference wasn't net-front work. It was goalies, and goalies alone.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI1 / 4 · 0.98 xG
WPG1 / 3 · 0.59 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI4 / 16 · 1.52 xG
WPG0 / 14 · 1.55 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI2 / 30 · 0.38 xG
WPG0 / 46 · 0.78 xG

PHI went 4-for-16 from medium danger on 1.52 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
7 G · 2.88 xG · +4.1
WPG
1 G · 2.92 xG · -1.9
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+1.9
E. ComrieWPG
-1.6
C. HellebuyckWPG
-2.5

PHI finished +4.1 against expected, WPG -1.9 — C. Hellebuyck (WPG) allowed 2.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST1/14
SNAP4/10
SLAP1/7
BACKHAND1/4
TIP IN0/1
OTHER0/14
WPG
WRIST0/16
SNAP1/10
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/8
TIP IN0/3
OTHER0/19
PHI
WPG
Off the rush
5 G on 22 · 2.06 xG
0 G on 27 · 1.92 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.35 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.43 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 1-for-14, WPG 0-for-16. PHI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Couturier
#14 · C · PHI
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 17:01 TOI · +2
N. Cates
#27 · L · PHI
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 13:33 TOI · +3
R. Ristolainen
#55 · D · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:45 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • E. Comrie (WPG) gave up 1.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • WPG created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WPG underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • PHI outperformed their expected goals by 4.1 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at WPG · 7:00 PM ET

Flyers at Jets: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 11:23 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
PHI
Model favorite
51%
49%
PHI50WPG

PHI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.42.4 WPG; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →WPG
51.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.34
2.20xGA / 602.55
1.96Goals for / gm1.90
1.82Goals against / gm2.10
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.998

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.998) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Models project a 2.4–2.4 game with the Flyers at 50% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Philadelphia commands the underlying play. At 5v5, they post 51.0% expected goals to Winnipeg's 48.0%, creating higher-leverage chances despite slightly undershooting (Corsis of 48.0% to WPG's 49.0%). Over a season, that edge compounds; in one game, goaltending variance erases it. The Flyers' 1.008 PDO against Winnipeg's 0.998 shows their shooting luck has tracked their underlying skill.

C. Hellebuyck's back-to-back status introduces volatility. Winnipeg may start a backup or ride a fatigued starter—either path tilts the goaltending edge.

Owen Tippett powers the Flyers. At 0.88 xG/60 with 19 goals, 18 assists, and two hard-deadline goals, he's both creating elite volume and converting at a 12.1% clip—sustainable and sharp. Christian Dvorak trails in creation (0.81 xG/60) but has posted 12 goals and 21 assists with three hard-deadline goals and an 11.2% shooting mark, proving efficient within a secondary role.

Kyle Connor leads Winnipeg's charge. His 0.83 xG/60 edges below Tippett's, yet he's compiled 25 goals and 30 assists with two hard-deadline goals—his goal total padded above what his shot quality alone predicts. Nino Niederreiter (0.87 xG/60, six goals, six assists, three hard-deadline goals) carries an 8.6% shooting rate, below average, leaving variance to unfold either direction.

The split is clear: Philadelphia holds the underlying advantage in shot quality. Winnipeg counters with secondary scoring depth and the home rink. Hellebuyck's fitness is the inflection point. A rested backup might outperform a fatigued No. 1.

At exactly 50% win probability, this game has no edge. Whichever team's stars execute sharper wins.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters